Login or Register for FREE!
Subelement E9

ANTENNAS AND TRANSMISSION LINES

Section E9A

Basic antenna parameters: radiation resistance, gain, beamwidth, efficiency; effective radiated power (ERP) and effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP)

What is an isotropic radiator?

  • A calibrated, unidirectional antenna used to make precise antenna gain measurements
  • An omnidirectional, horizontally polarized, precisely calibrated antenna used to make field measurements of antenna gain
  • Correct Answer
    A hypothetical, lossless antenna having equal radiation intensity in all directions used as a reference for antenna gain
  • A spacecraft antenna used to direct signals toward Earth

An isotropic radiator is a theoretical point source of electromagnetic waves which radiates the same intensity of radiation in all directions. It has no preferred direction of radiation. It radiates uniformly in all directions over a sphere centred on the source.

Isotropic radiators are used as reference radiators with which other sources are compared.

Source: Wikipedia - Isotropic Radiator

One Word Key "theoretical"

Last edited by sapient-prickly-0y. Register to edit

Tags: none

What is the effective radiated power (ERP) of a repeater station with 150 watts transmitter power output, 2 dB feed line loss, 2.2 dB duplexer loss, and 7 dBd antenna gain?

  • 469 watts
  • 78.7 watts
  • 420 watts
  • Correct Answer
    286 watts

The power gain G in dB is given by the following equation: \[\text{Gain } G= 10\log\left({P_2 \over P_1}\right)\] where:

  • \(P_2\) is the output power in Watts
  • \(P_1\) is the power in Watts applied to the input

We may algebraically solve for \(P_2\):

\[P_2 = P_1\left(10^{G/10}\right)\] We now have a simple formula for other similar problems.

The input power is \(P_1 =150 \text{ W}\). The net gain is \(G=7-4.2 = 2.8 \text{ dB}\). Applying the formula: \begin{align} P_2 &= 150\cdot10^{2.8/10}\\ &= 150\cdot10^{0.28}=285.82\\ &\approx286\text{ W} \end{align}


Here's yet another way...

When I was studying for this exam, I came across a much easier way to calculate ERP. This method converts the transmitter power to dB Watts so that you can easily add and subtract gains and losses. This technique requires a calculator that has a log function, which is allowed at the exam.

Using this question as an example: \[10\log(150)=21.8\]

Now you have apples and apples so you can add and subtract gains and losses: \[21.8 -2 -2.2 +7 = 24.56091259\]

Next you will need to divide by 10: \[24.56091259/10 = 2.456091259\]

TIP: You may want to store this temporarily in memory before proceeding.

Finally, apply the inverse log to return the gain (or loss) in Watts): \begin{align} InvLog(2.456091259)&=10^{2.456091259}\\ &\approx285.8\approx286\text{ W} \end{align}


Or use the "cheat": The net gain is \(7 - 4.2 = 2.8 \text{ dB}\). We know that \(3 \text{ dB}\) gain is double, so \(2.8\) is just under that. Double would be \(300\) watts so \(286\) is the only answer that is close.

Last edited by wileyj2956. Register to edit

Tags: none

What term describing total radiated power takes into account all gains and losses?

  • Power factor
  • Half-power bandwidth
  • Correct Answer
    Effective radiated power
  • Apparent power

Effective radiated power (ERP) is used to describe the highest concentration of RF energy that is radiated in a particular direction. As such, it includes all of the gains and losses of the antenna system, including focusing the radiated power. Yagi antennas, and other designs, have "gain" over a reference dipole, and must be considered when calculating effective radiated power. If the antenna has gain in a particular direction, that gain has to be calculated as part of the ERP. If an antenna design results in 3dBd gain (3dB greater than a dipole), then the ERP is twice what it would be with a dipole.

Last edited by k6yxh. Register to edit

Tags: none

Which of the following factors affect the feed point impedance of an antenna?

  • Transmission line length
  • Correct Answer
    Antenna height
  • The settings of an antenna tuner at the transmitter
  • The input power level

The feed-point impedance of an antenna can be influenced by near-by conductive objects, including proximity to the ground.

Antenna height is the only answer that has anything to do with the antenna and its surrounding environment. The other answers do not affect the antenna.

Last edited by n6sjd. Register to edit

Tags: none

What does the term “ground gain” mean?

  • The change in signal strength caused by grounding the antenna
  • The gain of the antenna with respect to a dipole at ground level
  • To force net gain to 0 dB by grounding part of the antenna
  • Correct Answer
    An increase in signal strength from ground reflections in the environment of the antenna
This question does not yet have an explanation! Register to add one

Tags: none

What is the effective radiated power (ERP) of a repeater station with 200 watts transmitter power output, 4 dB feed line loss, 3.2 dB duplexer loss, 0.8 dB circulator loss, and 10 dBd antenna gain?

  • Correct Answer
    317 watts
  • 2,000 watts
  • 126 watts
  • 300 watts

Sum the losses in the various stages:

\(4 \text{ dB} + 3.2 \text{ dB}+ 0.8\text{ dB}\) adds up to \(8\text{ dB}\) of loss in the total feed system. However, the antenna system gives us \(10\text{ dB}\) of gain (relative to a dipole). Fortunately, the question asks for the effective radiated power (ERP) relative to a dipole so no change to the antenna gain figure is needed.

\(10\text{ dBd}\) antenna gain minus \(8\text{ dB}\) feed system loss gives us an overall gain of \(2\text{ dB}\).

\(\text{Gain }G = 10\log\left(\frac{P_2}{P_1}\right)\), and we need to solve for \(P_2\), the ERP:

\[2\text{ dB} = 10\log\left(\frac{P_2}{200}\right)\]

Divide both sides by \(10\) giving:

\[0.2\text{ dB} = \log\left(\frac{P_2}{200}\right)\]

Take the inverse log of both sides:

\[10^{0.2} = \frac{P_2}{200}\]

evaluate:

\[1.585 = \frac{P_2}{200}\]

Multiply both sides by \(200\):

\[(1.585)(200) = P_2\]

Solve:

\[P_2 = 316.98\]


Alternatively, we may algebraically solve for \(P_2\): \begin{align} P_2 &= P_1 \left(10^{G/10}\right)\\ &= 200\times10^{2/10} = 200\times10^{0.2}\\ &=316.98\\ &\approx317 \text{ W} \end{align}

We now have a simple formula for other similar problems.

Silly Hint: add 4dB and 3.2 dB for 7, only answer with 7 in it

Last edited by comdijital. Register to edit

Tags: none

What is the effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) of a repeater station with 200 watts transmitter power output, 2 dB feed line loss, 2.8 dB duplexer loss, 1.2 dB circulator loss, and 7 dBi antenna gain?

  • 159 watts
  • Correct Answer
    252 watts
  • 632 watts
  • 63.2 watts

In this example, the net gain after subtracting the total losses is equal to: \[7\text{ dB} – (2 \text{ dB} + 2.8 \text{ dB} + 1.2 \text{ dB}) = 1 \text{ dB} \] That’s equivalent to a ratio of \(1.26:1\), so the effective radiated power (ERP) is $200 \text{ W} \times 1.26 = 252 \text{ W} $.


Or

\[P_2 = 200 \times 10^{0.1} = 251.8 \text{ W} \]

Where does 0.1 come from? \begin{align} \mathrm{ERP} &= \mathrm{TPO} \times \log^{-1} \left(\frac{\text{system gain}}{10}\right) \\ &= \mathrm{TPO} \times \log^{-1} \left(\frac{1}{10}\right) \\ &= \mathrm{TPO} \times \log^{-1} (0.1) \\ &= 200 \times 10^{0.1} \end{align} Inverse log = \(b^y\) where \(\mathrm{base} = 10\) and \(y = 0.1\)

transmitter power output (TPO)

Where does the ratio \(1.26:1\) come from?

Actually it can be reverse calculated after you find the ERP BY THE 2ND METHOD


For additional information: https://www.kb6nu.com/extra-class-question-of-the-day-effective-radiated-power/

Last edited by wileyj2956. Register to edit

Tags: none

Which frequency band has the smallest first Fresnel zone?

  • Correct Answer
    5.8 GHz
  • 3.4 GHz
  • 2.4 GHz
  • 900 MHz
This question does not yet have an explanation! Register to add one

Tags: none

What is antenna efficiency?

  • Radiation resistance divided by transmission resistance
  • Correct Answer
    Radiation resistance divided by total resistance
  • Total resistance divided by radiation resistance
  • Effective radiated power divided by transmitter output

Antenna efficiency is a term that relates what portion of the power delivered to the antenna actually gets radiated.

The total resistance is the resistance that is seen at the terminals of the antenna and is composed of two parts:

  1. Radiation resistance
  2. Loss resistance

Loss resistance turns the power into heat instead of radiating it into the air, while radiation resistance is the part that turns the energy into useful radio waves.


Example An antenna has an input resistance of \(500\) Ohms and a radiation resistance of \(25\) Ohms.

Antenna efficiency would be: \begin{align} \text{antenna efficiency} &= \frac{\text{radiation resistance}}{\text{total resistance}} \times 100\%\\ &=\frac{25 \:\Omega}{500 \:\Omega} \times 100\%\\ &=5\% \end{align}

So \(5\%\) of the power delivered to the antenna gets radiated, the other \(95\%\) is wasted as heat.

Last edited by wileyj2956. Register to edit

Tags: none

Which of the following improves the efficiency of a ground-mounted quarter-wave vertical antenna?

  • Correct Answer
    Installing a ground radial system
  • Isolating the coax shield from ground
  • Shortening the radiating element
  • All these choices are correct

One of the ways you can improve an antenna's efficiency is to reduce losses from resistance. Anything that dissipates the energy of your RF increases total resistance and soil resistance can be significant.

When you install a system of radial wires at the base of a ground-mounted vertical antenna current flows into the radials instead of into the soil, thus reducing losses.

Last edited by valeria. Register to edit

Tags: none

Which of the following determines ground losses for a ground-mounted vertical antenna operating on HF?

  • The standing wave ratio
  • Distance from the transmitter
  • Correct Answer
    Soil conductivity
  • Take-off angle

High soil conductivity improves ground reflections and ground wave propagation. This effect is also the reason why waves are able to travel very far over large bodies of water.

Hint: Ground \(=\) soil

Last edited by zekeabrams116. Register to edit

Tags: none

How much gain does an antenna have compared to a half-wavelength dipole if it has 6 dB gain over an isotropic radiator?

  • Correct Answer
    3.85 dB
  • 6.0 dB
  • 8.15 dB
  • 2.79 dB

A 1/2-wave dipole antenna has approximately \(2.15 \text{ dB}\) of gain over an isotropic antenna. So \[6 \text{ dB} - 2.15 \text{ dB} = 3.85 \text{ dB}\]

(The directive gain of a half-wave dipole is 1.64. It has a 2.15 gain over an isotropic antenna or \(10\log_{10}(1.64)\approx2.15\text{ dBi}\))

Silly way to remember: The 1/2 way number is in the answer, which is a sum of the ends: 3.85... 3+5=8

Last edited by pcrequest. Register to edit

Tags: none

Go to E8D Go to E9B